Verdicts & Settlements

Millions recovered. Hundreds of matters of record.

Below is a selected record of verdicts and settlements obtained for individual clients of the Law Office of Steven T. Auerbach. The matters span employment discrimination and retaliation, work-injury and workers' compensation, and complex civil litigation in Pennsylvania state and federal courts. Many client names are anonymized as Doe v. per the terms of resolution; identifying details have been generalized accordingly.

  • Millions Recovered for clients
  • Hundreds Matters of record
  • 30+ Years of combined legal experience

Selected Matters

By practice area.

Employment Law & Discrimination

10 matters

Sexual harassment, retaliation, race and national origin discrimination, religious discrimination, equal pay, hostile work environment, and wage-and-hour matters in Pennsylvania state and federal courts.

YearCaseAmountType
2026 Doe v. Restaurant Chain Sexual Harassment$240,000Settlement
2025 Doe v. Dental Implant Company National Origin Discrimination$645,000Verdict / Settlement
2025 Doe v. Adult Novelty Store Sexual Harassment$90,000Settlement
2024 Doe v. Private School Retaliation$175,000Settlement
2022 Bates v. County of Montgomery Hostile Environment / Retaliation$115,000Settlement
2022 Doe v. Transportation Company (2022) Equal Pay Act Violation$105,000Settlement
2022 Doe v. School District Wage / Hour$98,844Settlement
2021 Rosenblit v. City of Philadelphia Religious Discrimination$90,000Settlement
2018 Doe v. Health System Retaliation$12,000,000Verdict / Settlement
2018 Williams v. City of Philadelphia Sexual Harassment$127,500Settlement

Workers' Compensation

11 matters

Catastrophic and disabling work injuries, denied workers' compensation claims, and administrative appeals against employers, insurers, and Pennsylvania transit, healthcare, and construction-sector defendants.

YearCaseAmountType
2025 Williams-Meadows v. SEPTA Work Injury$2,067,936Verdict
2025 Doe v. Transportation Company (2025) Work Injury$150,000Settlement
2024 Gomley v. SEPTA Work Injury$125,000Settlement
2024 Morrison v. PHMC Work Injury$95,000Settlement
2024 Chase v. PHMC Work Injury$85,000Settlement
2023 Caldwell v. Camp Towanda Work Injury$1,136,304Verdict
2023 Richardson v. Carson Valley Children’s Aid Work Injury$120,000Settlement
2021 Gibbons v. Sterling Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center Work Injury$128,000Settlement
2019 Renna v. M.W. Donnelly, Inc. Work Injury$105,000Settlement
2018 Bedford v. Stone & Webster Construction Work Injury$150,000Settlement
2017 Lopez v. SEPTA Work Injury$1,431,248Verdict

Civil Litigation

5 matters

Commercial breach-of-contract and breach-of-fiduciary-duty claims, professional negligence matters, and complex civil disputes in Pennsylvania state and federal courts.

YearCaseAmountType
2025 LNL Home Services, LLC v. Santos Breach of Fiduciary Duty$1,724,997Verdict
2022 Doe v. Philadelphia Hospital Negligence$725,000Settlement
2022 Shears v. Ideal Renovations, LLC Breach of Contract$222,335.40Verdict
2021 NJ Options for Wellness, LLC v. 8 Boys LLC Breach of Contract$110,000Settlement
2020 Hollinsworth v. Jones Breach of Contract$100,000Settlement

About these results

How the record is reported.

The matters above represent a selection of verdicts and settlements obtained by the Law Office of Steven T. Auerbach for individual clients of the firm. Some client names are anonymized as Doe v. under the terms of confidential resolution; identifying details have been generalized accordingly.

Recovery amounts reflect the gross resolution figure (verdict, judgment, settlement, or combination thereof) before adjustment for liens, fees, costs, and any contingent payments. Where a matter resolved through both a verdict and a subsequent settlement, the combined figure is reported.

Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case turns on its specific facts, evidence, applicable law, and venue. The matters described above are not predictions of outcome in any future case. Prior results obtained by the firm in unrelated matters cannot serve as the basis for legal advice in any matter not actually represented by the firm.

Tell us what happened. We'll tell you what you have.